TV Show Review, “WW2 in the Pacific” on American Heroes Channel (AHC)

TV Show Review, “WW2 in the Pacific” on American Heroes Channel (AHC)

This show is misleading viewers into falsehood.  It’s a gross exaggeration of what happened in the Pacific during WW2 even if the footage is more accurate than the immature history lessons given.  A narrator in this show violates the general authorities of Japan and United States to the point of unsatisfactory, nail-and-polish opinions which don’t meld well with excellent history books.  First of all, it’s already been proven that Okinawa didn’t show everything the Japanese had.  Japanese soldiers weren’t just fighting because of an American stomach but also by the very nature of their affiliations with eastern philosophies west of California and Hawaii; particulars included Chinese-Japanese fusions and the overall notoriety of Asiatics.  And what about the other atomic forms of weaponry United States had in store for Japan after the first two atomic launchings towards Japan’s semi-conditional surrender?  There’s too many history books on Japan to make things more apparent for TV viewers and I find AHC offensive for such ignorance since they seem to portray a hopeless solution for Americans and their atomic weaponry- for that matter, the video has the guts to claim that we ran out of atomic bombs after the first two atomic launchings and historians ought to know this lie isn’t correct.  Then again, it’s become apparent to me that soldiers and fighters across the world tend to “pinch” each other with desperados, wild directions, and gross exaggeration.  AHC probably got caught up in 2015 in their own frenzy of disinformation which they believed appealed to patriotism more than compassion.  Let me tell readers something.  I’m here to dispute with the creators of the show for their incompetence and child-like mannerisms.  No, wait.  I think children at times are more mature than American Heroes Channel.  Historians at times tend to get caught up in the rallies and stories behind army slogans to the point of self-censorship of truth and mere noise.  Freedom itself doesn’t mean historians can say whatever they feel like; in fact, because of freedom, certain ideologies like nazism and violent communism have to be censored so there’s peace and harmony between us on innocent ideologies.  What freedom means is that there’s expression and truth rather than noise and confusion.  Besides, we can probably make out the chaos against our discord and adjust our messages for the world, not just in terms of legality but also prosperity.  “WW2 in the Pacific” ends with the message that peace came to everyone and we lived happily ever after, although (even if the show doesn’t mention it) the Japanese continued to be in turmoil and committed suicide or other self-harms in regards to their failure of achieving spiritual dignity, fantastic privilege, and leaving it on a full stomach.  Extreme hunger would remain a problem for the Japanese for years to come.  So where’s the peace, and how can the narrator believe in his falsifier of commonplaces?  Honestly I’m pretty grossed out now.  Some Americans just won’t admit they’re racist and this show is glaring evidence.  Perhaps I can tell the creators to play video games and give more pointers in my technological references through opinions on gaming.  If they want to be silly without actually harming the public with disinformation, then they’ll have to play video games and leave history lessons for the experts.  Random commenting on war footage does not impress me if it only turns the tables against everyone when they weren’t there to begin with.

  https://youtu.be/sSDA3ZLESmo