Movie Review, “Labyrinth” (1986) for the 4K TV (2021)
It’s a “classic” movie for the 4K TV. With YouTube, I can watch something from the past even if 1986 is no longer around. The movie does not work for reasoning skills since it’s a fantasy that shows off fancy ignorance. A description for “Labyrinth” says it’s a work of science fiction; however, it’s not science fiction, because poetry is the dominating factor to the silly, nonsensical characters. Science fiction would actually have some sort of imaginary reference to science. Here, “Labyrinth” is about a lustful fantasy regarding emotion and feeling, not chemistry and psychology. Just words like “chemistry” and “psychology” are the kinds of words you don’t find in the common public of communications. A woman in real life would say “I love you” and not “I have psychology for you”. “Labyrinth” does get very colorful where the dark spots of film take place. You can hear the movie, but you also need to listen where the ideas matter. Hearing alone is not enough for any reasoning or logic. Poetry is a field where readers and viewers usually just look at words and hear words without thinking about vocabulary and meaning; or, if they think anything of vocabulary and meaning, it’s based on falsehood. A fantasy can make so much sense to a fool as she looks away in disgust. The movie begins with a ridiculous circumstance you won’t find anywhere in California. For all my life, I have never seen a girl go to a park and recite a poem. What a coward! I would like to see a girl in California actually do that. What’s the point of showing actors do something in film that the public should do also and, with the results, not seeing the public in California really do these things the actors should do? My ideas are not random; you’re just not interested in study. I know what I’m talking about. Whatever you do, do not listen to music with lyrics you don’t hear the lyrics of. You should be hearing and listening at the same time. (So, maybe a lady will believe she is listening and say, “I can’t hear you.” Nonsense! If you’re not hearing, you’re not listening.) I can listen to “Labyrinth” very much because I can hear “Labyrinth”. Honestly, I can’t find good reasons for the fantasy. Sarah gets into trouble due to lack of reason; and, she gets so happy in the end for lacking reason. I don’t find this convincing at all. You do find characters in the film with reasons of their own. However, she doesn’t appreciate their reasons and just needs the characters for some senseless party like a night owl in jeans and plastic. Why is Sarah staying up so late? She is a night owl and shuts out another night owl by lack of reason; and, with lack of reason, she can begin the trouble all over again for herself and her baby brother. From examining her words I don’t think she respects reason. To her, it’s just some meaningless rant or some meaningless puzzle- who cares if a fine young lady has no reasons of her own? I’m a poet. I write poems and I don’t want any reader to lack reason. Not to mention, “Labyrinth” gives criticism of junk, only to go back to the junk and support it due to lack of reason for the junk to be arrived at. This makes no sense to me. Junk is junk and non-junk is non-junk. It’s a lie about treasures and fortunes. Modern art often goes too deep in the sense factor and we’re left with problems of our own for ignorance and doubt. Many characters (including the goblins) are nothing but ignorance. Making matters worse, Sarah invites some of these goblins back into her home after everything that happens to her baby brother. It’s a false emotion of illogical attitude. Viewers at home who enjoy “Labyrinth” just like the pretty colors and shapes and don’t pay attention to what the movie really does. Trouble begins from lack of reason and trouble ends from lack of reason. That would only make sense to a philosophical nutcase.
https://www.deviantart.com/gameuniverso/art/Review-of-Labyrinth-1986-Movie-899609891
No comments:
Post a Comment